Research Article
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e71107
https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.71107 (29 Dec 2021)
https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.71107 (29 Dec 2021)
Other versions:
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TabsTabs
- TaxaTaxa
- DataData
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
-
Article title
-
Abstract
-
Key Words
-
Introduction
-
Material and methods
-
Sample collection
-
Sample processing and morphological identification
-
Experimental set-up and library preparation
-
Processing of raw reads
-
Alpha diversity of DNA metabarcoding datasets
-
Beta diversity analyses of DNA metabarcoding datasets
-
-
Results
-
Species composition based on morphological identification
-
Processing of raw reads
-
Alpha diversity based on DNA metabarcoding
-
Betadiversity analysis of the DNA metabarcoding datasets
-
-
Discussion
-
High number of unique ASVs per sample does not show the genetic diversity, but reflects PCR or sequencing errors
-
DNA replicates from bulk DNA samples increase macrobenthos species detection
-
Pooling DNA replicates does not change alpha and beta diversity patterns
-
PCR replicates from bulk DNA samples substantially differ in the detection of rare species
-
Comparison between morphological identification and the metabarcoding method
-
-
Conclusion
-
Data accessibility statement
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
-
Supplementary materials
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories