Forum Paper
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 3: e34735
https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.3.34735 (11 Jul 2019)
https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.3.34735 (11 Jul 2019)
Other versions:
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TaxaTaxa
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
Targeted non-invasive bioindicator species detection in eDNA water samples to assess and monitor the integrity of vulnerable alpine freshwater environments. Ecological Indicators 129: 107916.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107916
Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 22: 1231.
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13512
Ecosystems monitoring powered by environmental genomics: A review of current strategies with an implementation roadmap. Molecular Ecology 30: 2937.
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15472
A comparison of genetically and morphometrically identified macroinvertebrate community index scores with implications for aquatic life use attainment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 194: .
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-021-09525-w
Meta‐analysis shows both congruence and complementarity of DNA and eDNA metabarcoding to traditional methods for biological community assessment. Molecular Ecology 31: 1820.
DOI: 10.1111/mec.16364
Monitoring invasive alien macroinvertebrate species with environmental DNA . River Research and Applications 38: 1400.
DOI: 10.1002/rra.3947
Modelling technical and biological biases in macroinvertebrate community assessment from bulk preservative using multiple metabarcoding markers. Molecular Ecology 30: 3221.
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15620
How can eDNA contribute in riverine macroinvertebrate assessment? A metabarcoding approach in the Nalón River (Asturias, Northern Spain). Environmental DNA 1: 385.
DOI: 10.1002/edn3.40
Evaluation of primer pairs for eDNA‐based assessment of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera across a biogeographically diverse region. Environmental DNA 4: 1356.
DOI: 10.1002/edn3.342
Mitochondrial Genomes, Phylogenetic Associations, and SNP Recovery for the Key Invasive Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Europe. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22: 10300.
DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910300
Metabarcoding unsorted kick‐samples facilitates macroinvertebrate‐based biomonitoring with increased taxonomic resolution, while outperforming environmental DNA. Environmental DNA 3: 353.
DOI: 10.1002/edn3.116
Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder. Molecular Ecology 30: 3140.
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15587
Toward global integration of biodiversity big data: a harmonized metabarcode data generation module for terrestrial arthropods. GigaScience 11: .
DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giac065
Ecological quality in freshwater streams is reflected across all three domains of life. Ecological Indicators 130: 108059.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108059
The potential of exact sequence variants (ESVs) to interpret and assess the impact of agricultural pressure on stream diatom assemblages revealed by DNA metabarcoding. Ecological Indicators 122: 107322.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107322
Building on gAMBI in ports for a challenging biological invasions scenario: Blue-gNIS as a proof of concept. Marine Environmental Research 169: 105340.
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2021.105340
Wet grinding of invertebrate bulk samples – a scalable and cost-efficient protocol for metabarcoding and metagenomics. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: .
DOI: 10.3897/mbmg.5.67533
Integration of DNA-Based Approaches in Aquatic Ecological Assessment Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Water 13: 331.
DOI: 10.3390/w13030331
Hidden diversity: DNA metabarcoding reveals hyper-diverse benthic invertebrate communities. BMC Ecology and Evolution 23: .
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-023-02118-w
A validation scale to determine the readiness of environmental DNA assays for routine species monitoring. Environmental DNA 3: 823.
DOI: 10.1002/edn3.189
Water eDNA metabarcoding is effective in detecting non-native species in marinas, but detection errors still hinder its use for passive monitoring. Biofouling 38: 367.
DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2022.2075739
Uncovering the complete biodiversity structure in spatial networks: the example of riverine systems. Oikos 129: 607.
DOI: 10.1111/oik.06806
Comparing species detection success between molecular markers in DNA metabarcoding of coastal macroinvertebrates. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: .
DOI: 10.3897/mbmg.5.70063
Improved freshwater macroinvertebrate detection from environmental DNA through minimized nontarget amplification. Environmental DNA 3: 261.
DOI: 10.1002/edn3.177
Stream macroinvertebrate reintroductions: A cautionary approach for restored urban streams. Freshwater Science 41: 507.
DOI: 10.1086/721471
Assessing different components of diversity across a river network using eDNA. Environmental DNA 1: 290.
DOI: 10.1002/edn3.33
Using unsorted sweep-net samples to rapidly assess macroinvertebrate biodiversity. Freshwater Science 40: 551.
DOI: 10.1086/716215
Cooking small and large portions of “biodiversity‐soup”: Miniaturized DNA metabarcoding PCRs perform as good as large‐volume PCRs. Ecology and Evolution 11: 9092.
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7753
A Synthesis of Marine Monitoring Methods With the Potential to Enhance the Status Assessment of the Baltic Sea. Frontiers in Marine Science 7: .
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.552047
Future of DNA-based insect monitoring. Trends in Genetics : .
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2023.02.012
Zooplankton biodiversity monitoring in polluted freshwater ecosystems: A technical review. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology 1: 100008.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2019.100008
Environmental DNA-Based Methods in Biodiversity Monitoring of Protected Areas: Application Range, Limitations, and Needs. Diversity 14: 463.
DOI: 10.3390/d14060463
Translational Molecular Ecology in practice: Linking DNA-based methods to actionable marine environmental management. Science of The Total Environment 744: 140780.
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140780