<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "../../nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">61</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:F9A654F3-34B8-5338-9F9C-D38A394E7BA2</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5CE9DD54-787E-40FD-BBD1-1303CA183EB4</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Metabarcoding and Metagenomics</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">MBMG</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2534-9708</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Pensoft Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/mbmg.10.192801</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">192801</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Primer Validation</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Actinopterygii</subject>
          <subject>Chordata</subject>
          <subject>Milyeringidae</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>DNA barcoding</subject>
          <subject>DNA reference libraries</subject>
          <subject>Environmental impact assessment </subject>
          <subject>Species Inventories</subject>
          <subject>Theory &amp; Methodology</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>Australia</subject>
          <subject>Western Australia</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Cave gudgeon (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp.) <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> assay for rapid detection in the dark</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>White</surname>
            <given-names>Nicole E.</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">nicole.white@curtin.edu.au</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-6693</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>van der Heyde</surname>
            <given-names>Mieke</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Guzik</surname>
            <given-names>Michelle T.</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Heydenrych</surname>
            <given-names>Matthew J.</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A4">4</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Moore</surname>
            <given-names>Glenn I.</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2413-5260</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A4">4</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A5">5</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Allentoft</surname>
            <given-names>Morten E.</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A6">6</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Trace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia</addr-line>
        <institution>Trace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Perth</addr-line>
        <country>Australia</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/02n415q13</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Subterranean Research and Groundwater Ecology, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia</addr-line>
        <institution>Subterranean Research and Groundwater Ecology, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Perth</addr-line>
        <country>Australia</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/02n415q13</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia</addr-line>
        <institution>School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Adelaide</addr-line>
        <country>Australia</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A4">
        <label>4</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia</addr-line>
        <institution>School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Perth</addr-line>
        <country>Australia</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/047272k79</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A5">
        <label>5</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Collections and Research, Western Australian Museum, Welshpool, WA, 6059, Australia</addr-line>
        <institution>Collections and Research, Western Australian Museum</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Welshpool</addr-line>
        <country>Australia</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A6">
        <label>6</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Section for GeoGenetics, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</addr-line>
        <institution>Section for GeoGenetics, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Copenhagen</addr-line>
        <country>Denmark</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/035b05819</uri>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Nicole E. White (<email xlink:type="simple">Nicole.White@curtin.edu.au</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: Bernd Hänfling</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>17</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>10</volume>
      <elocation-id>e192801</elocation-id>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/AAB322B0-EBD5-57DE-AF7A-4AD0D5C832C4">AAB322B0-EBD5-57DE-AF7A-4AD0D5C832C4</uri>
      <uri content-type="zenodo_dep_id" xlink:href="https://zenodo.org/record/0">0</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>26</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>29</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Nicole E. White, Mieke van der Heyde, Michelle T. Guzik, Matthew J. Heydenrych, Glenn I. Moore, Morten E. Allentoft</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>Australia has two eyeless cave gudgeons (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) which are restricted to subterranean waters and listed as vulnerable and endangered. Despite being a priority conservation target species, they are inadequately monitored as their restricted distribution in groundwater ecosystems impedes conventional surveying methods, constraining effective monitoring and conservation. As part of ongoing efforts to improve monitoring and conservation of these subterranean fish species, we developed and validated a genus-specific <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> assay for detecting species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Mitochondrial genomes were sequenced and assembled to inform PCR assay design, which was then validated <italic>in-silico</italic>, <italic>in-vitro</italic>, and <italic>in-situ</italic>. The assay demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity, particularly for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Limit of Detection, <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev>: 1.36 copies per reaction), and successfully detected <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev>: 12.8 copies per reaction) with moderate sensitivity in groundwater samples from Cape Range. No PCR amplification occurred in non-target surface water samples. This assay provides a non-invasive, robust tool for conservation monitoring cryptic subterranean fishes, supporting conservation management in habitats where traditional survey methods are impractical.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Key words:</label>
        <kwd>Biomonitoring</kwd>
        <kwd>cave fish</kwd>
        <kwd>environmental DNA</kwd>
        <kwd>metabarcoding</kwd>
        <kwd>mitochondrial genome</kwd>
        <kwd>vulnerable</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>
            <named-content content-type="funder_name">BHP Billiton</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="funder_identifier">501100006525</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="funder_ror">https://ror.org/04674kj97</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="funder_doi">http://doi.org/10.13039/501100006525</named-content>
          </funding-source>
        </award-group>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Monitoring groundwater ecosystems in Australia faces several significant challenges. Effective monitoring is crucial to manage and protect these ecosystems, which are vital for biodiversity and human use, but groundwater monitoring often lacks comprehensive baseline data on biodiversity which is crucial for effective management and decision-making (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Tello and Hazelton 2018</xref>). The varying hydrogeological characteristics of aquifers make it challenging to predict and monitor groundwater dynamics accurately. This heterogeneity can lead to significant time lags between groundwater extraction and its impacts on ecosystems, complicating the monitoring process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kelly et al. 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Saccò et al. 2023</xref>). Climate change exacerbates monitoring challenges by altering recharge rates, increasing evapotranspiration, and changing precipitation patterns. These challenges necessitate adaptive monitoring approaches to manage the increased stress on groundwater resources and dependent ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Barron et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Barbieri et al. 2023</xref>). While remote sensing and GIS offer potential for monitoring specific aspects of groundwater ecosystems, these do not take into account the biodiversity contained within groundwater ecosystems and their applications are still in the early stages, with limited successes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chiloane et al. 2022</xref>).</p>
      <p>The ability to collect accurate biodiversity information is essential as ecosystems come under pressure and species are threatened (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Turner et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Pawlowski et al. 2021</xref>). Australia is recognised for its ancient and diverse subterranean and groundwater dependent ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Saccò et al. 2022a</xref>). Three groundwater-restricted vertebrate species occur in north-western Australia, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Barrow Cave Gudgeon), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Cave Gudgeon; both in <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Eleotridae">Eleotridae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>/<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Milyeringidae">Milyeringidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ophisternon">Ophisternon</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candidum">candidum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Blind Cave Eel; <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Synbranchidae">Synbranchidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Humphreys 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Larson et al. 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Moore et al. 2018</xref>), although subterranean invertebrates dominate these same ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Humphreys and Adams 1991</xref>). The cave gudgeons, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, have been categorised as endangered and critically endangered respectively by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Moore 2019a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2019b</xref>). Representing an exceptional evolutionary history (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chakrabarty et al. 2012</xref>), these species are listed as vulnerable under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 of Western Australian and listed as vulnerable (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and endangered (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 by the Australian Commonwealth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Australian Biological Resources Study 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water 2025</xref>). Both species are currently known to have a limited distribution with low population numbers and reside in vulnerable habitats. The current threats include nutrient enrichment and pollution, lowering of the water table, and urban, tourism and industrial development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Romero and Vanselow 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gomon and Bray 2025</xref>).</p>
      <p>Information on the population distribution and genetic diversity of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is fundamental to effectively design and implement valid impact assessments and conservation strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">White et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Dawkins et al. 2025</xref>). Current approaches rely on visual surveys and trapping, which are logistically challenging and often ineffective. A viable alternative to conservation monitoring is environmental DNA (<abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev>), the DNA shed by organisms into the environment through excretions, secretions, and tissues such as skin cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Taberlet et al. 2012</xref>). The analysis of <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> has been successfully applied in many ecological disciplines, including biodiversity assessment, dietary studies, and the detection of invasive, cryptic, or threatened species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Takahashi et al. 2023</xref>).</p>
      <p>Environmental DNA methodologies have rapidly evolved, with metabarcoding and probe-based assay emerging as two dominant approaches for biodiversity monitoring (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Saccò et al. 2022b</xref>). Each method offers distinct advantages and limitations, making their selection highly dependent on research objectives. Metabarcoding enables broad taxonomic detection from a single sample, facilitating comprehensive community-level assessments and the discovery of unexpected or cryptic taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Morris et al. 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Nordstrom et al. 2024</xref>). Its compatibility with high-throughput sequencing platforms allows for efficient processing of large sample sets. However, metabarcoding is constrained by PCR biases, limited sensitivity for low-abundance targets, and the need for robust bioinformatic pipelines and reference databases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">van der Heyde et al. 2026</xref>). In contrast, probe assays offer high sensitivity and specificity for detecting individual species, making them ideal for targeted surveillance of rare (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Dawkins et al. 2025</xref>) or invasive taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Dubreuil et al. 2021</xref>). They also provide quantitative data, which can be linked to organismal abundance under certain conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bylemans et al. 2025</xref>). The simplicity of laboratory protocols and data analysis further enhances their utility in routine monitoring. Nonetheless, probe assays are limited to pre-defined species targets and hence cannot provide community-level insight, and require time-intensive assay development for each species of interest. Consequently, metabarcoding is frequently the best suited approach for exploratory or ecosystem-wide biodiversity studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Sohn and Song 2024</xref>), while probe assays are preferable for focused, species-specific applications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Klymus et al. 2020</xref>). Integrating both approaches may offer a complementary strategy, balancing breadth and precision in <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev>-based ecological research.</p>
      <p>Given <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> inhabit groundwater, and the suitability of <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> for conservation monitoring aquatic systems, the objectives of this study were to; (1) sequence and assemble the mitochondrial genomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from vouchered museum specimens; (2) develop a metabarcoding assay specific for the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, from the mitochondrial genomes, with the aim to detect both species with a targeted qPCR assay; (3) validate the assay <italic>in-silico</italic>, <italic>in-vitro</italic>, and <italic>in-situ</italic> to assess its suitability as an effective conservation monitoring tool for these elusive groundwater vertebrates.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="methods" id="sec2">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Tissue samples and mitochondrial genome sequencing" id="sec3">
        <title>Tissue samples and mitochondrial genome sequencing</title>
        <p>Two tissue samples of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were obtained from ethanol preserved specimens in the Western Australian Museum (<named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Western Australian Museum" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/09d260e0-a509-40c7-bef5-b0f5444be84a">WAM</named-content> P.35191-001, 2016, Barrow Island, bore SF-RD3-02-20160229-02, and <named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Western Australian Museum" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/09d260e0-a509-40c7-bef5-b0f5444be84a">WAM</named-content> P.35192-001, 2016, Barrow Island, bore SF-RD7-01-20160302-01) and two tissue samples of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Western Australian Museum" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/09d260e0-a509-40c7-bef5-b0f5444be84a">WAM</named-content> P.35198-001, 2012, Cape Range, Bundera area bore S1, and <named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Western Australian Museum" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/09d260e0-a509-40c7-bef5-b0f5444be84a">WAM</named-content> P.35200-001, 2015, Cape Range, Camerons Cave bore CC2; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table SS1) for DNA extraction and mitochondrial genome sequencing. Total genomic DNA (<abbrev xlink:title="genomic DNA">gDNA</abbrev>) was extracted using QIAGEN blood and tissue kit (Qiagen; Venlo, Netherlands) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The concentration of <abbrev xlink:title="genomic DNA">gDNA</abbrev> was measured using a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Genomic DNA libraries were prepared using a DNA Prep library kit (Illumina; New York, USA), a bead-based transposome complex to tagment <abbrev xlink:title="genomic DNA">gDNA</abbrev>, targeting the 1-9ng of input <abbrev xlink:title="genomic DNA">gDNA</abbrev>. The genomic libraries were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with standard 500-cycle V2 chemistry (250 bp paired-end sequencing run) following the manufacture’s protocol.</p>
        <p>Mitochondrial genome assembly was completed using the program MitoZ version 3.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Meng et al. 2019</xref>) with data quality control, filtering, assembly and annotation performed. Software defaults for assembly and annotation were used with ‘vertebrate’ specified as the taxonomic source to guide the selection of mitochondrial genome scaffolds. Gene annotations were confirmed using Galaxy Australia (<ext-link xlink:href="https://usegalaxy.org.au" ext-link-type="uri">https://usegalaxy.org.au</ext-link>) with MITOS2, a publicly accessible web-based platform for computational biology. Structural features of annotated mitochondrial genomes, including gene length, nucleotide composition, and start/stop codons, were extracted in Geneious Prime version 25.0.3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kearse et al. 2012</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Assay design and validation testing" id="sec4">
        <title>Assay design and validation testing</title>
        <p>The mitochondrial control region was selected as the targeted qPCR assay for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> given its high variability and ability to provide greater resolution for distinguishing closely related populations, making it useful for assessment of both intraspecific and interspecific variation. Consensus sequences were aligned and conserved primer regions targeting ~230bp region for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were identified, with the final assay designed using Primer3 in Geneious Prime. The blast function was used in Geneious Prime to perform <italic>in-silico</italic> PCR across the NCBI GenBank database to retrieve any sequence that would bind with four or fewer mismatches to the forward and reverse primers. gBlocks of 280bp for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> control region were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (<abbrev xlink:title="Integrated DNA Technologies">IDT</abbrev>) which allow for the primer binding site, a 10bp overhang at the 3’ end of the strand, and an 8bp sequence (AGCTAGCT) insert to allow for detection of synthetic DNA verses target DNA when future processing of samples occurs.</p>
        <p>A range of annealing temperatures was assessed to optimise assay conditions. To validate the optimal annealing temperature, a gradient qPCR was performed in seven reactions for each species ranging from 55 °C to 61 °C (run in 2-degree increments) using a theoretical input of approximately 4 × 10<sup>10</sup> copies per ul of synthetic DNA (gBlocks; Integrated DNA Technologies) and serial diluted 10-fold across the seven reactions to ~42,450 copies per ul. Those conditions found to generate the lowest cycle threshold (<abbrev xlink:title="cycle threshold">CT</abbrev>) value, optimal amplification curve, and sharp melt peak were considered to represent the optimal annealing conditions and were therefore implemented throughout the remainder of the study.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ)" id="sec5">
        <title>Limit of Detection (<abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev>) and Limit of Quantification (<abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev>)</title>
        <p>A standard curve using the optimal temperature, with analysis performed on ten replicates for each of the 7-points in a 10-fold dilution series of the synthetic <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> control region DNA (theoretical ~0.04 copies to 42,450 copies; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: tables S2, S3). The definitions of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Klymus et al. (2019)</xref> for <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> were implemented, where <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> represents the lowest standard concentration of template DNA that produced at least 95% positive replicates and <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> represents the lowest standard concentration that could be quantified with a coefficient of variation (<abbrev xlink:title="coefficient of variation">CV</abbrev>) value below 35%. To determine these values, data from the replicate standard curves in RStudio using the script published by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Klymus et al. (2019)</xref> with the parameters left as default were used.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Specificity and inhibition testing" id="sec6">
        <title>Specificity and inhibition testing</title>
        <p>For exclusion testing, <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> extracts were obtained from a metabarcoding study (A. Lawrie pers. comm.) of surface water from the Swan Coastal Plain of Western Australian from which several fish taxa were identified, including <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Geophagus">Geophagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (cichlids), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pseudogobius">Pseudogobius</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (gobies), <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Cypriniformes">Cypriniformes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (minnows and carps), <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Cyprinodontiformes">Cyprinodontiformes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (toothcarps), <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Gobiiformes">Gobiiformes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (gobies), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Carassius">Carassius</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="auratus">auratus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Goldfish), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Gambusia">Gambusia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="holbrooki">holbrooki</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Eastern <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Gambusia">Gambusia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Geophagus">Geophagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="brasiliensis">brasiliensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Pearl Cichlid) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Leptatherina">Leptatherina</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="wallacei">wallacei</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Western Hardyhead) commonly found in surface water in a freshwater system in southern Western Australia (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S4). Criteria for successful exclusion tests were for no amplification to occur ≤ 40 cycles in any of the 7-point (10-fold dilution series) of the fish <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> from surface water with no expected amplification. Further replicate series of 7-point (10-fold dilution series) of the fish <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> from surface water was spiked with two concentrations of synthetic DNA, 424 and 42 copies/ul (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and 42 and 4 copies/ul (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) as positive controls with expected amplification. A total of 40 reactions including non-template controls for exclusion testing were conducted. Positive amplified products (£40 cycles) were checked for expected size using QIAxcel (Qiagen; Venlo, Netherlands) and sent for sanger sequencing at AGRF to confirm the presence of the target species.</p>
        <p>For inhibition testing, an <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> extract from a previous metabarcoding study (A. Guthrie pers. comm.) that showed PCR-inhibitory properties where the neat (i.e., no dilution) showed no amplification and the 1/10 and 1/100 dilution failed to show a 3.3 cycle shift when tested with a species-specific probe assay. Two concentrations of synthetic DNA, 424 and 42 copies/ul (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and 42 and 4 copies/ul (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) were spiked in a 7-point replicate series where the inhibition was diluted in a 10-fold series. A total of 32 reactions including non-template controls for inhibition testing were conducted. Positive amplified products were checked for expected size using QIAxcel.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Assay validation: environmental DNA samples" id="sec7">
        <title>Assay validation: environmental DNA samples</title>
        <p>The targeted qPCR assay was <italic>in-situ</italic> validated on groundwater samples collected from the Cape Range peninsula in Western Australia where <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is known to occur. A total of six groundwater <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> samples collected during a Blind Cave Eel (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ophisternon">O.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candidum">candidum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) study and Cave Gudgeons (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) were visually observed to co-occur at the time of groundwater collection. These samples were tested in triplicate reactions at two dilutions to account for potential inhibition: neat (i.e., no dilution; <italic>n</italic> = 18 reactions) and 1/10 (<italic>n</italic> = 18 reactions), alongside positive and negative controls for a total of 38 reactions. Positive amplified products (≤40 cycles) were checked for expected size using QIAxcel and sent for sanger sequencing at Australian Genome Research Facility, Perth, Western Australia to confirm the presence of the target species.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec8">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Mitochondrial genomes" id="sec9">
        <title>Mitochondrial genomes</title>
        <p>Sequencing data from two <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (AWFS-F21-191 with 8,190,706 reads and AWFS-F21-192 with 7,368,386 reads) tissue samples were assembled to complete, circular sequences with high read coverage (&gt;30×) across each mitogenome. Sequencing data from two <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (AWFS-F21-189 with 1,197,618 reads and AWFS-F21-190 with 634,158 reads) resulted in a 332 bp fragment of the ND5 and ND6 gene not being assembled with the data retrieved (AWFS-F21-189; <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), although a near circular sequence with &gt; 15× coverage was achieved for the remainder of the mitogenome. Sample AWFS-F21-190 with less than 635,000 reads failed to produce a mitogenome. The final assembly length being 16,588bp, consistent with expected mitogenome sizes, and each contained the full complement of mitochondrial genes for vertebrates. As found in other gudgeons (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eleotris">Eleotris</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="acanthopomus">acanthopomus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>; <ext-link xlink:href="MH367493" ext-link-type="gen">MH367493</ext-link>) we identified two rRNA, 22 tRNA, and 13 protein-coding genes, plus the putative control region and these were annotated and deposited on GenBank (<ext-link xlink:href="PX694302" ext-link-type="gen">PX694302</ext-link>, <ext-link xlink:href="PX694303" ext-link-type="gen">PX694303</ext-link>, <ext-link xlink:href="PX694304" ext-link-type="gen">PX694304</ext-link>). High-throughput sequencing achieved robust coverage for three out of four tissue samples, ensuring the completeness and reliability of the resulting contigs. Each assembled mitogenome is therefore considered essentially complete and well-validated, with only minor caveats in one problematic region (ND5 and ND6; <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) that are inherent to mitochondrial genome assembly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Ribarska et al. 2022</xref>). The closest mitochondrial match (78.6%) currently on GenBank was to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Oxyeleotris">Oxyeleotris</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="marmorata">marmorata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<ext-link xlink:href="KP663727" ext-link-type="gen">KP663727</ext-link>), the marble gudgeon found in Asia. The aligned <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenomes from tissue collected in 2016 from two bores on Barrow Island, Western Australia, contained 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms (<abbrev xlink:title="single nucleotide polymorphisms">SNPs</abbrev>) corresponding to 0.1% sequence variation. An alignment of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenomes with the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> genome, excluding the CR and 322 bp region of the ND5 and ND6 gene showed 2,538 <abbrev xlink:title="single nucleotide polymorphisms">SNPs</abbrev> (11.3% sequence variation) amongst the three mitogenomes. These well-characterised genome assemblies offered the necessary resolution for downstream analyses, including <italic>in-silico</italic> assay design. The accuracy of the builds was further validated through reference-based mapping and consensus sequence confirmation, establishing a solid foundation for future genetic and conservation monitoring studies.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Assay design, optimisation, and validation" id="sec10">
        <title>Assay design, optimisation, and validation</title>
        <p>A successfully designed genus-specific assay, herein called MilyeringaCR, for detection of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and which amplifies a 236 bp fragment of the control region, excluding primer binding sites has been validated. The 263 bp fragment of the control region exhibited 85 <abbrev xlink:title="single nucleotide polymorphisms">SNPs</abbrev> corresponding to 29.9% sequence variation between the two species within the targeted region. The optimised MilyeringaCR assays were in 25 mL reaction volumes consisting of 2 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub> (Fisher Biotec, Australia), 1 × Taq polymerase buffer (Fisher Biotec, Australia), 0.4 mM dNTPs (Astral Scientific, Australia), 0.1 mg bovine serum albumin (Fisher Biotec, Australia), 0.8 mM of each primer (MilyeringaCR654F and Milyeringa903R), 0.2 mL of AmpliTaq Gold (AmpliTaq Gold, ABI, USA), 0.6 µL SYBR Green and 2 mL of template <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> or synthetic DNA. The cycling conditions were: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 50 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s, a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min followed by a melt curve from 60 °C to 95 °C with data capture every 1 °C increment. The primer sequence for the MilyeringaCR assay are as follows: MilyeringaCR654F 5’-ACATTTCAGAGTGCAGCGC-3’ and MilyeringaCR903R 5’-GCTTTCCTGTT TCCGGGGG-3’.</p>
        <p>During <italic>in-vitro</italic> testing, the inclusivity criteria (amplification of target DNA at ≤ 40 cycles) and exclusivity criteria (amplification of non-target DNA at ≥ 40 cycles) were met successfully. The assay was tested against numerous fish taxa found in surface water in southern Western Australia (see methods) with no amplification observed using the MilyeringaCR assay.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Assay LOD and LOQ" id="sec11">
        <title>Assay <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev></title>
        <p>Analysis of the dilution standard curve for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> synthetic DNA showed good precision (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.998), a slope of -3.46, and efficiency of 94%. Analysis of the standard curve for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> synthetic DNA showed lower precision (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.862), a slope of -3.66, and efficiency of 88%. Based on the criteria applied, the discrete <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was calculated to be 1.36 copies/reaction (where 95% of the replicates showed amplification) and the <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> was 6 copies/reaction (as determined by decay modelling using a <abbrev xlink:title="coefficient of variation">CV</abbrev> of 0.35). The discrete <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was calculated to be 12.8 copies/reaction and the <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> was 524 copies/reaction. Using the modelled calculation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Klymus et al. (2019)</xref>, the calculated <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was 1.36 copies/reaction and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> to be 12.8 copies/reaction (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">9213CBA3-4DFE-50AD-BE80-8A0054D4DD91</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Standard curve showing the modelled limit of detection (<abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev>; solid red line) and limit of quantification (<abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev>; dotted black line) for the MilyeringaCR assay per <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Klymus et al. (2019)</xref>. Cq is the cycle number at which the fluorescent signal crossed the defined threshold above background fluorescent levels in the PCR reaction. <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> were calculated to be 1.36 copies/reaction and 6 copies/reaction, respectively for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> were calculated to be 12.8 copies/reaction and 524 copies/reaction, respectively for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Left insert - illustration of the holotype (male) of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> - <named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Western Australian Museum" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/09d260e0-a509-40c7-bef5-b0f5444be84a">WAM</named-content> P.33166-001. Right insert - illustration of a female Cave Gudgeon, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> - <named-content content-type="dwc:institutional_code" xlink:title="Western Australian Museum" xlink:href="https://scientific-collections.gbif.org/institution/09d260e0-a509-40c7-bef5-b0f5444be84a">WAM</named-content> P.33157-001. Source: Helen K. Larson in Fishes of Australia, <ext-link xlink:href="https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/species/1172" ext-link-type="uri">https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/species/1172</ext-link> and <ext-link xlink:href="https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/species/4857" ext-link-type="uri">https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/species/4857</ext-link>.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="mbmg-10-e192801-g001.jpg" id="oo_1777486.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1777486</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Empirical LOQ" id="sec12">
        <title>Empirical <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev></title>
        <p>Quantitative PCR performance varied between the two species with the genus-specific <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> assay. The <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> assay demonstrated high sensitivity, with a modelled limit of detection (<abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev>) of 1.36 copies per reaction and a modelled limit of quantification (<abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev>) of 6 copies per reaction. Empirical testing further supported this sensitivity, with consistent amplification observed at 4 copies per reaction. In contrast, the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> assay showed a higher <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> of 12.8 copies per reaction and a modelled <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> of 524 copies per reaction. However, empirical results indicated reliable amplification at much lower concentrations, with all 10 replicates amplifying successfully at 41 copies per reaction (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). The MilyeringaCR assay targeting <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> showed high sensitivity and precision, while the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> assay demonstrated reliable amplification below its modelled <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev>, indicating effective detection at lower concentrations (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>).</p>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Performance comparison of a single genus-specific <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> assay targeting both <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> synthetic DNA. Limits of detection (<abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev>) and modelled limits of quantification (<abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev>) were estimated using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Klymus et al. (2019)</xref> script with a coefficient of variation threshold of 35%. Empirical <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> values represent the lowest DNA concentration at which all PCR replicates (10/10) amplified successfully.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Modelled <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> (copies/reaction)</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Modelled <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> (copies/reaction)</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Empirical <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> (copies/reaction)</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.36</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">12.8</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">524</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">41</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Environment-based inhibition" id="sec13">
        <title>Environment-based inhibition</title>
        <p>The MilyeringaCR assay, when tested in the presence of inhibition, failed to amplify <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> synthetic DNA, at neat and 1/10 dilution concentrations when four and 42 copies/reaction were spiked in. The remaining five dilution series reactions showed <abbrev xlink:title="cycle threshold">CT</abbrev> values ranging from 30.9 to 34. Similarly for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, failed amplification was observed at neat and 1/10 dilution concentrations, as expected, when 41 and 411 copies/reaction were spiked in and the remaining five reactions showed <abbrev xlink:title="cycle threshold">CT</abbrev> values ranging from 32.1 to 37.8. The MilyeringaCR assay was able to detect <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> DNA in the presence of environmental PCR inhibitors with <abbrev xlink:title="cycle threshold">CT</abbrev> values &lt; 40 cycles.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Environmental DNA samples" id="sec14">
        <title>Environmental DNA samples</title>
        <p>Testing of field samples demonstrated that the assay could detect <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> DNA in groundwater samples from Cape Range, with successful PCR amplification observed in 15 of the 18 reactions (83%) of the neat <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> groundwater extracts with melt peaks identical to the positive control. Sanger sequencing confirmed the amplicons to be 100% match to the reference mitogenome indicating successful <italic>in-situ</italic> validation as the MilyeringaCR was able to amplify its intended target DNA. The 1/10 dilution reactions showed 11 of the 18 (61%) positive reactions had <abbrev xlink:title="cycle threshold">CT</abbrev> values &gt; 40 cycles and the criteria for successful inclusion tests were for amplification to occur ≤ 40 cycles. The amplicon size for the 1/10 dilution reactions was not confirmed on QIAxcel, although the melt peaks were identical to the positive controls. No amplification was observed in laboratory or PCR negative controls, while all positive controls amplified successfully.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec15">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <sec sec-type="Challenges in monitoring subterranean fauna" id="sec16">
        <title>Challenges in monitoring subterranean fauna</title>
        <p>Conservation monitoring cave gudgeons (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp.) presents several significant challenges due to their biology, habitat, and conservation status. These small, eyeless fish live in lightless subterranean aquifers and caves, with narrow ranges, deep and shallow underground and completely in the dark, but sometimes venturing to the surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Humphreys 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chakrabarty 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Page et al. 2018</xref>). However, most <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> habitats are physically inaccessible to humans, limiting the use of visual observation or direct sampling. Compounding this, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp. occur at extremely low densities, making them difficult to detect using traditional methods like visual surveys (cave diving and cameras), netting or baited trapping. Both <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are species of conservation concern, limiting the ability to capture or handle individuals for study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">DCCEEW 2025</xref>). Monitoring must be non-invasive and ethically sound, which restricts the use of some conventional techniques. In the last decade, <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> technology has revolutionised the survey of rare aquatic fauna, including subterranean fauna, and provides a viable alternative to conventional monitoring practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Gorički et al. 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">White et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">van der Heyde et al. 2023</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Assay performance and implications" id="sec17">
        <title>Assay performance and implications</title>
        <p>The genus-specific targeted qPCR assay, presented here, will dramatically improve detection sensitivity of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp. in their subterranean aquifer habitats. The assay demonstrates very high specificity and sensitivity for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> with a modelled <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> of 1.36 copies/reaction and <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> of 6 copies/reaction which should significantly improve conservation monitoring of this endangered species endemic to the groundwater on Barrow Island, Western Australia. Despite Barrow Island being a Class A Nature Reserve since 1910, is the site of the large Gorgon gas processing project and, until recently, an active oil field since the 1960s. The known habitat of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> coincides with the island’s industrial zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Saccò et al. 2022c</xref>). This situation presents unique conservation challenges: the primary threat being habitat disturbance from industrial activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Moore 2019b</xref>). Therefore, this genus-specific targeted qPCR assay will fundamentally improve the ability to detect and routinely monitor this cryptic subterranean fish.</p>
        <p>The MilyeringaCR assay developed for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> demonstrates moderate specificity and sensitivity, with a modelled <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> of 12.8 copies per reaction and a <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> of 524 copies per reaction. Indeed, the sensitivity of the assay was substantially lower for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev>: 12.8 copies/reaction; <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev>: 524 copies/reaction) than for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. This discrepancy is unlikely to be due to differences in primer binding efficiency, as <italic>in-silico</italic> validation confirmed identical primer binding sites between the two species. Furthermore, both assays were validated using synthetic DNA standards, ensuring precise quantification of input DNA molecules during PCR reactions. These controls increase confidence that the observed differences in sensitivity reflect true assay performance rather than experimental variability.</p>
        <p>While the modelled <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> for the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> assay was estimated at 524 copies per reaction using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Klymus et al. (2019)</xref> R script with a coefficient of variation threshold of 35%, empirical testing demonstrated consistent amplification at much lower concentrations. Specifically, all 10 replicates amplified successfully at 41 copies per reaction, inclusive of the inhibition testing and the exclusion testing, indicating reliable detection below the modelled <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev>. This discrepancy suggests that while the assay may not meet the strict precision criteria for quantification at lower concentrations, it remains effective for detection. Reporting both the modelled <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> and the empirically supported detection threshold provides a more comprehensive view of assay performance, particularly for field applications where consistent detection is often more critical than precise quantification. This highlights the importance of interpreting modelled thresholds alongside empirical performance, particularly when assessing an assay utility for field-based <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> applications.</p>
        <p>Overall, this genus-specific <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> assay offers a robust and non-invasive tool for detecting <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp. in subterranean environments, overcoming the limitations of traditional survey methods. Its demonstrated sensitivity, particularly for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, supports its application in routine conservation monitoring and conservation management of these cryptic and threatened cave fishes.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Genetic insights and future directions" id="sec18">
        <title>Genetic insights and future directions</title>
        <p>The mitochondrial genome data generated in this study provide preliminary insights into the genetic diversity of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> on Barrow Island. Sequencing of the mitogenomes (<italic>n</italic> = 2) revealed intraspecific variation, with 12 <abbrev xlink:title="single nucleotide polymorphisms">SNPs</abbrev> detected, corresponding to 0.1% sequence divergence. In contrast, comparative analysis with the mostly complete mitogenome of the closely related <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> identified 2,538 <abbrev xlink:title="single nucleotide polymorphisms">SNPs</abbrev>, representing 11.3% sequence divergence. These findings could suggest limited haplotype diversity within the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> population, potentially indicative of a population bottleneck, founder effect or restricted gene flow. However, given the small sample size, this apparent homogeneity should be interpreted cautiously. Broader spatial and temporal groundwater sampling on Barrow Island may uncover additional mitochondrial diversity. Such efforts would enhance our understanding of population structure and evolutionary history for this species of conservation concern.</p>
        <p>Comparison of the 236 bp fragment of the control region from the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenome with sequences derived from groundwater samples collected at two distinct sites in Cape Range revealed a 100% match. This perfect sequence identity supports the utility of <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> with a targeted qPCR assay for detecting this species in groundwater systems. The control region, known for its high mutation rate relative to other mitochondrial loci, is typically expected to exhibit considerable haplotypic variation. The absence of such variation in the current dataset may reflect limited sampling or a genetically homogeneous population. However, given the small fragment size and the early stage of sampling, it is possible that additional haplotypes were not captured in this study. Future targeted qPCR assay efforts incorporating broader spatial and temporal sampling may reveal greater genetic diversity within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> populations in Cape Range. These findings underscore the importance of continued <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> surveillance to refine our understanding of population structure and connectivity in subterranean aquatic ecosystems.</p>
        <p>This study demonstrates the critical role of <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> in overcoming the inherent challenges of monitoring cryptic subterranean species such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp. The development and validation of this genus specific assay provides a sensitive, non-invasive tool for detecting these endangered cave fishes in groundwater habitats. The higher sensitivity of the assay to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> compared to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> underscores the importance of species-specific optimisation for reliable detection. Preliminary mitochondrial genome analyses revealed limited haplotype diversity within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and sequence identity between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and Cape Range groundwater samples, suggesting potential genetic homogeneity; however broader sampling is required. Future targeted qPCR assay surveys across spatial and temporal scales will be essential to refine our understanding of population structure, connectivity, and evolutionary history. By integrating molecular tools with conservation management, this work establishes a foundation for routine conservation monitoring in subterranean ecosystems, offering a scalable approach to safeguard species of high conservation concern in environments where traditional survey methods are impractical.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We thank Angus Lawrie for providing <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> extracts from the LiWA project (<abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> for Global Environment Studies programme, funded by BHP’s Social Investment Framework), Austin Guthrie for providing inhibited <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> extracts from the phascogale nest box study, Michael Curran and Dean Main for collecting groundwater from the Cape Range peninsula as part of the blind cave eel study, <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> Frontiers for providing the <abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> extracts for <italic>in-situ</italic> field validation of the MilyeringaCR assay and Ben Heyward for running the <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev>/<abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> script on the validation results.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Australian Biological Resources Study (2020) Australian Faunal Directory, Canberra, Australia. [Accessed 14/10/2025] <ext-link xlink:href="https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/home" ext-link-type="uri">https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/home</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Barbieri M, Barberio MD, Banzato F, Billi A, Boschetti T, Franchini S, Gori F, Petitta M (2023) Climate change and its effect on groundwater quality. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 45: 1133–1144. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10653-021-01140-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-01140-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Barron O, Silberstein R, Ali R, Donohue R, McFarlane DJ, Davies P, Hodgson G, Smart N, Donn M (2012) Climate change effects on water-dependent ecosystems in south-western Australia. Journal of Hydrology 434: 95–109. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.028" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.028</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Bylemans J, Everts T, Brys R, Duncan RP (2025) From anarchy to clarity, data pre-processing and statistical choices influence quantitative environmental DNA (eDNA) analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 16(7): 1322–1333. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/2041-210X.70064" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.70064</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Chakrabarty P (2010) Status and phylogeny of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Milyeringidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Teleostei</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Gobiiformes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), with the description of a new blind cave-fish from Australia, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">brooksi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, n. sp. Zootaxa 2557(1): 19–28. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/zootaxa.2557.1.2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2557.1.2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Chakrabarty P, Davis MP, Sparks JS (2012) The first record of a trans-oceanic sister-group relationship between obligate vertebrate troglobites. PLoS ONE 7(8): e44083. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0044083" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044083</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Chiloane C, Dube T, Shoko C (2022) Impacts of groundwater and climate variability on terrestrial groundwater dependent ecosystems: a review of geospatial assessment approaches and challenges and possible future research directions. Geocarto International 37(23): 6755–6779. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/10106049.2021.1948108" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1948108</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Dawkins KL, Heyward B, Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M, White NE, Allentoft ME (2025) A qPCR assay for the threatened Pilbara olive python (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Liasis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">olivaceus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies">barroni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Environmental DNA 7(4): e70114. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/edn3.70114" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70114</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water [DCCEEW] (2025) Conservation Advice for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Barrow cave gudgeon). Canberra. <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/species/pubs/86867-conservation-advice-19032025.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/species/pubs/86867-conservation-advice-19032025.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (2008) Approved Conservation Advice for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Blind Gudgeon). Canberra: Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Dubreuil T, Baudry T, Mauvisseau Q, Arqué A, Courty C, Delaunay C, Sweet M, Grandjean F (2021) The development of early monitoring tools to detect aquatic invasive species: eDNA assay development and the case of the armored catfish <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Hypostomus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">robinii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Environmental DNA 4(2): 349–362. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/edn3.260" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.260</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Gomon MF, Bray DJ (2025) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in fishes of Australia. [accessed 30 Oct 2025] <ext-link xlink:href="https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/species/1172" ext-link-type="uri">https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/species/1172</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Gorički Š, Stanković D, Snoj A, Kuntner M, Jeffery WR, Trontelj P, Pavićević M, Grizelj Z, Năpăruş-Aljančič M, Aljančič G (2017) Environmental DNA in subterranean biology: range extension and taxonomic implications for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Proteus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Scientific Reports 7(1): 45054. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/srep45054" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45054</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Humphreys WF (1999) The distribution of Australian cave fishes. Records of the Western Australian Museum 19: 469–472.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Humphreys WF (2001) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Eleotridae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), a remarkably versatile cave fish from the arid tropics of northwestern Australia. Environmental biology of Fishes 62(1): 297–313. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1023/A:1011880726946" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011880726946</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Humphreys WF, Adams M (1991) The subterranean aquatic fauna of the North West Cape peninsula, Western Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum 15: 383–411.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28(12): 1647–1649. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Kelly BGJ, Timms WA, Andersen MS, McCallum AM, Blakers RS, Smith R, Rau GC, Badenhop A, Ludowici K, Acworth RI (2013) Aquifer heterogeneity and response time: the challenge for groundwater management. Crop &amp; Pasture Science 64(12): 1141–1154. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1071/CP13084" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13084</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Klymus KE, Merkes CM, Allison MJ, Goldberg CS, Helbing CC, Hunter ME, Jackson CA, Lance RF, Mangan AM, Monroe EM, Piaggio AJ, Stokdyk JP, Wilson CC, Richter CA (2019) Reporting the limits of detection and quantification for environmental DNA assays. Environmental DNA 2(3): 271–282. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/edn3.29" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.29</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Klymus KE, Ruiz Ramos DV, Thompson NL, Richter CA (2020) Development and testing of species-specific quantitative PCR assays for environmental DNA applications. Journal of Visualized Experiments 165: e61825. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3791/61825" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3791/61825</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Larson HK, Foster R, Humphreys WF, Stevens MI (2013) A new species of the blind cave gudgeon (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Pisces</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Gobioidei</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Eleotridae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from Barrow Island, Western Australia, with a redescription <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Whitley. Zootaxa 3616(2): 135–150. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/zootaxa.3616.2.3" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3616.2.3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Meng G, Li Y, Yang C, Liu S (2019) MitoZ: a toolkit for animal mitochondrial genome assembly, annotation and visualization. Nucleic Acids Research 47(11): e63 <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/nar/gkz173" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz173</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Moore G (2019a) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T13555A123378349. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T13555A123378349.en" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T13555A123378349.en</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Moore G (2019b) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T128969918A128970120. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T128969918A128970120.en" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T128969918A128970120.en</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Moore GI, Humphreys WF, Foster R (2018) New populations of the rare subterranean Blind Cave Eel <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ophisternon</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">candidum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Synbranchidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) reveal recent historical connections throughout north-western Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 69(10): 1517–1524. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1071/MF18006" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1071/MF18006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Morris L, Beesley LS, Stevens ER, Gwinn DC, Hyde J, Thompson S, Gleeson DB, Douglas MM (2024) Active eDNA is more cost-effective than Fyke nets or passive eDNA collection when monitoring the invasion of an alien freshwater fish. Environmental DNA 6: e70010. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/edn3.70010" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70010</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Nordstrom B, Budd A, Mitchell N, Cornish C, Byrne M, Kuchling G, Jarma S (2024) Environmental DNA reflects spatial distribution of a rare turtle in a lentic wetland assisted colonization site. Environmental DNA 6: e507. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/edn3.507" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.507</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Page TJ, Stevens MI, Adams M, Foster R, Velasco-Castrillón A, Humphreys WF (2018) Multiple molecular markers reinforce the systematic framework of unique Australian cave fishes (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Gobioidei</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Australian Journal of Zoology 66(2): 115–127. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1071/ZO18008" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO18008</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Pawlowski J, Bonin A, Boyer F, Cordier T, Taberlet P (2021) Environmental DNA for biomonitoring. Molecular Ecology 30(13): 2931–2936. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/mec.16023" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16023</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Ribarska T, Bjørnstad PM, Sundaram AYM, Gilfillan GD (2022) Optimization of enzymatic fragmentation is crucial to maximize genome coverage: a comparison of library preparation methods for Illumina sequencing. BMC Genomics 23(1): 92. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/s12864-022-08316-y" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08316-y</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Romero A, Vanselow PBS (2000) Threatened fishes of the world: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Whitley, 1945 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Eleotridae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Environmental Biology of Fishes 57(1): 36. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1023/A:1007571206495" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007571206495</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Saccò M, Blyth AJ, Douglas G, Humphreys WF, Hose GC, Davis J, Guzik MT, Martínez A, Eberhard SM, Halse SA (2022a) Stygofaunal diversity and ecological sustainability of coastal groundwater ecosystems in a changing climate: The Australian paradigm. Freshwater Biology 67(12): 2007–2023. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/fwb.13987" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13987</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Saccò M, Guzik MT, van der Heyde M, Nevill P, Cooper SJB, Austin AD, Coates PJ, Allentoft ME, White NE (2022b) eDNA in subterranean ecosystems: Applications, technical aspects and future prospects. Science of the Total Environment 820: 153223. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153223" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153223</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Saccò M, Humphreys WF, Stevens N, Jones MR, Taukulis F, Thomas E, Blyth AJ (2022c) Subterranean carbon flows from source to stygofauna: a case study on the atyid shrimp <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Stygiocaris</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">stylifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Holthuis, 1960) from Barrow Island (WA). Isotopes in Environmental Health Studies 58(3): 247–257. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/10256016.2022.2071873" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2022.2071873</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Saccò M, Mammola S, Altermatt F, Alther R, Bolpagni R, Brancelj A, Brankovits D, Fiser C, Gerovasileiou V, Griebler C, Guareschi S, Hose GC, Korbel K, Lictevout E, Malard F, Martinez A, Niemiller ML, Robertson A, Tanalgo KC, Bichuette ME, Borko S, Brad T, Campbell MA, Cardoso P, Celico F, Cooper SJB, Culver D, Lorenzo TD, Galassi DMP, Guzik MT, Hartland A, Humphreys WF, Ferreira RL, Lunghi E, Nizzoli D, Perina G, Raghavan R, Richards Z, Reboleira ASPS, Rohde MM, Fernandez DS, Schmidt SI, van der Heyde M, Weaver L, White NE, Zagmajster M, Hogg I, Ruhi A, Gagnon MM, Allentoft ME, Reinecke R (2023) Groundwater is a hidden global ecosystem. Global Change Biology 30: e17066. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/gcb.17066" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17066</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Sohn H, Song Y (2024) Monitoring of mammal and bird species in an urban ecological park using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Urban Ecosystems 27: 1891–1904. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s11252-024-01557-7" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01557-7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Willerslev E (2012) Towards next‐generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology 21(8): 2045–2050. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05470.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05470.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Takahashi M, Saccò M, Kestel JH, Nester G, Campbell MA, van der Heyde M, Heydenrych MJ, Juszkiewicz DJ, Nevill P, Dawkins KL, Bessey C, Fernandes K, Miller H, Power M, Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M, Newton JP, White NE, Richards ZT, Allentoft ME (2023) Aquatic environmental DNA: A review of the macro-organismal biomonitoring revolution. Science of the Total Environment 873: 162322. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162322" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162322</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Tello E, Hazelton J (2018) The challenges and opportunities of implementing general purpose groundwater accounting in Australia, Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 25(3): 285–301. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/14486563.2018.1431157" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2018.1431157</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Turner MG, Calder WJ, Cumming GS, Hughes TP, Jentsch A, LaDeau SL, Lenton TM, Shuman BN, Turetsky MR, Ratajczak Z, Williams JW, Williams AP, Carpenter SR (2020) Climate change, ecosystems and abrupt change: Science priorities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 375(1794): 20190105. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1098/rstb.2019.0105" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0105</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>van der Heyde M, White NE, Nevill P, Austin AD, Stevens N, Jones M, Guzik MT (2023) Taking eDNA underground: Factors affecting eDNA detection of subterranean fauna in groundwater. Molecular Ecology Resources 23: 1257–1274. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1755-0998.13792" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13792</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>van der Heyde M, Curran M, Floeckner S, Nevill P, White NE, Austin AA, Guzik MT (2026) Validating COI eDNA Metabarcoding Primers for Detection of Subterranean Fauna. Molecular Ecology Resources 26, no. 3: e70127. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1755-0998.70127" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.70127</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>White NE, Guzik MT, Austin AD, Moore GI, Humphreys WF, Alexander J, Bunce M (2020) Detection of the rare Australian endemic blind cave eel (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ophisternon</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">candidum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) with environmental DNA: Implications for threatened species management in subterranean environments. Hydrobiologia 847(15): 3201–3211. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10750-020-04304-z" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04304-z</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="Additional information" id="sec19">
      <title>Additional information</title>
      <sec sec-type="Conflict of interest" id="sec20">
        <title>Conflict of interest</title>
        <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ethical statement" id="sec21">
        <title>Ethical statement</title>
        <p>No ethical statement was reported.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Artificial Intelligence (AI) use" id="sec22">
        <title>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</title>
        <p>The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.</p>
        <p>Regarding the use of AI in the preparation of this manuscript, the authors declare the following: Claude.</p>
        <p><bold>Used for</bold>: Literature discovery and brainstorming.</p>
        <p>Collation of existing research on cave gudgeon.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Funding" id="sec23">
        <title>Funding</title>
        <p>NEW is supported by the BHP Social Investment Fund (<abbrev xlink:title="environmental DNA">eDNA</abbrev> for Global Environment Studies programme).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author contributions" id="sec24">
        <title>Author contributions</title>
        <p>This study was designed by NEW; samples were provided by GIM for mitochondrial genome sequencing; assay design and testing were performed by NEW and MJH; all authors contributed to the writing of this paper.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author ORCIDs" id="sec25">
        <title>Author ORCIDs</title>
        <p>G.I. Moore <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2413-5260" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2413-5260</ext-link></p>
        <p>N.E. White <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-6693" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-6693</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data availability" id="sec26">
        <title>Data availability</title>
        <p>Data supporting the findings of this study are available in the supplementary information of this article.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/mbmg.10.192801.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="zenodo_dep_id">0</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">EC4C9334-C038-5796-802C-CCC54AF1EA8E</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Supplementary information</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>xlsx</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p><bold>table SS1</bold>. Biological tissue from Western Australian Museum for mitochondrial genome sequencing. <bold>table S2</bold>. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Cq values for <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> calculations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Klymus et al. 2019</xref>). <bold>table S3</bold>. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">Milyeringa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Cq values for <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Detection">LOD</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="Limit of Quantification">LOQ</abbrev> calculations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Klymus et al. 2019</xref>). <bold>table S4</bold>. List of fish species detected in surface water used for exclusion testing. <bold>table S5</bold>. Mitochondrial genome sequences (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="veritas">veritas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Milyeringa">M.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="justitia">justitia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) submitted to GenBank (<ext-link xlink:href="PX694302" ext-link-type="gen">PX694302</ext-link>, <ext-link xlink:href="PX694303" ext-link-type="gen">PX694303</ext-link>, <ext-link xlink:href="PX694304" ext-link-type="gen">PX694304</ext-link>).</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="mbmg-10-e192801-s001.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1777487.xlsx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1777487</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Nicole E. White, Mieke van der Heyde, Michelle T. Guzik, Matthew J. Heydenrych, Glenn I. Moore, Morten E. Allentoft</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
