<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://mbmg.pensoft.net/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">61</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:F9A654F3-34B8-5338-9F9C-D38A394E7BA2</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5CE9DD54-787E-40FD-BBD1-1303CA183EB4</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Metabarcoding and Metagenomics</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">MBMG</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2534-9708</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Pensoft Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/mbmg.10.183921</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">183921</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Bacillariophyta</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>DNA-based biomonitoring</subject>
          <subject>Environmental DNA </subject>
          <subject>Metabarcoding</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>Czech Republic</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Evaluation of two overlapping rbcL amplicons for routine diatom DNA biomonitoring</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Urbánková</surname>
            <given-names>Pavla</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">pavla.urbankova@ujep.cz</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1788-3863</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Štěpka</surname>
            <given-names>Jan</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1814-2035</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">J.E. Purkyně University, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic</addr-line>
        <institution>J.E. Purkyně University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Ústí nad Labem</addr-line>
        <country>Czech Republic</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Pavla Urbánková (<email xlink:type="simple">Pavla.Urbankova@ujep.cz</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: Demetrio Mora</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>22</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>10</volume>
      <elocation-id>e183921</elocation-id>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/525A4F2D-D191-5EA7-9570-6B59E23A371A">525A4F2D-D191-5EA7-9570-6B59E23A371A</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>31</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>07</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Pavla Urbánková, Jan Štěpka</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>Marker choice is a critical methodological factor in DNA metabarcoding, as it directly influences taxonomic composition and abundance structure of communities. In diatoms, metabarcoding is increasingly evaluated as an alternative to microscopy-based assessments, particularly for ecological status evaluation under the Water Framework Directive (<abbrev xlink:title="Water Framework Directive">WFD</abbrev>).</p>
        <p>Here, we compared two widely used <italic>rbc</italic>L markers (263 bp and 331 bp long) using identical benthic diatom samples to evaluate their suitability for ecological assessment.</p>
        <p>Both markers produced highly consistent community patterns and <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev>-based ecological classifications. Differences between datasets were mainly restricted to low-abundance taxa, while dominant taxa—driving most of the <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> signal—were consistently detected. Decomposition of <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> differences showed that variation was primarily driven by changes in the relative abundance of shared taxa and inconsistencies in species-level assignment, whereas marker-specific taxa had negligible influence.</p>
        <p>Overall, the 331-bp marker provided higher taxonomic resolution for abundant taxa, and its lower detection of rare taxa did not compromise ecological assessment. It is therefore well suited for routine biomonitoring under the <abbrev xlink:title="Water Framework Directive">WFD</abbrev>. Although marker-specific calibration may further improve quantitative accuracy, our results indicate that the 331-bp marker can be reliably applied without major methodological adjustments.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Key words:</label>
        <kwd>Amplicon length</kwd>
        <kwd>ecological assessment</kwd>
        <kwd>freshwater biomonitoring</kwd>
        <kwd>Species discrimination</kwd>
        <kwd>Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index (IPS)</kwd>
        <kwd>Water Framework Directive</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <funding-statement>Technology Agency of the Czech Republic: project TQ03000438 - Applicability of DNA metabarcoding for biomonitoring of streams in Ohre and Lower Elbe hydrological basins</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Diatom DNA metabarcoding is increasingly used in ecological studies as an alternative approach for species detection and community characterisation, offering high throughput and improved reproducibility compared to traditional light microscopy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Vasselon et al. 2017a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Mortágua et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Pérez-Burillo et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Kahlert et al. 2021</xref>). In freshwater biomonitoring, this molecular approach is being explored as an alternative tool to conventional microscopy-based assessments. Efforts are currently underway to harmonise laboratory protocols, bioinformatic workflows, and reference databases to enable the integration of metabarcoding into regulatory frameworks such as the Water Framework Directive (<abbrev xlink:title="Water Framework Directive">WFD</abbrev>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Vasselon et al. 2017b</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Keck et al. 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Tapolczai et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Pérez-Burillo et al. 2020</xref>).</p>
      <p>The chloroplast gene <italic>rbc</italic>L is currently considered the most promising target for diatom DNA metabarcoding. Different regions of this gene, varying in length and position, have been explored, ranging from short fragments suitable for degraded or sedimentary DNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Stoof-Leichsenring et al. 2015</xref>) to longer amplicons that generally provide higher taxonomic resolution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Pérez-Burillo et al. 2022</xref>). Although a range of alternative <italic>rbc</italic>L markers targeting different regions of the gene have been used in ecological studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">An et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Liu et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wolf and Vis 2020</xref>), their application in routine biomonitoring, particularly within the <abbrev xlink:title="Water Framework Directive">WFD</abbrev> framework, remains limited.</p>
      <p>Two widely used markers target overlapping regions of the <italic>rbc</italic>L gene but differ in amplicon length and primer design. The shorter marker amplifies a 263-bp fragment, whereas the longer marker amplifies a 331-bp fragment. The entire 263-bp region is contained within the 331-bp amplicon, corresponding to its 3' end, with the longer marker extending an additional 68 bp towards the 5' end. The shorter fragment is amplified using a highly degenerate multiplex primer set (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Vasselon et al. 2017a</xref>), whereas the longer fragment employs a single primer pair with lower degeneracy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kelly et al. 2020</xref>). These differences may influence amplification specificity, taxonomic resolution, and amplification efficiency, thereby affecting taxonomic composition and abundance structure of communities.</p>
      <p>At the sequence level, reduced marker length may limit the resolution of closely related taxa and intraspecific variation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Kahlert et al. 2019</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Pérez-Burillo et al. 2022</xref>), while differences in primer design may introduce amplification biases affecting the detection and relative abundance of taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Elbrecht and Leese 2015</xref>). However, it remains unclear how these differences propagate to species composition and, more importantly, to abundance-weighted ecological indices such as <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> under realistic biomonitoring conditions.</p>
      <p>Here, we directly compare the performance of the 263-bp and 331-bp <italic>rbc</italic>L markers by analysing identical benthic diatom samples using both primer sets. By linking ASV-level differences to species composition and <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev>-based ecological assessment, we test whether marker choice affects ecological conclusions or whether abundance-weighted indices remain robust across markers.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="methods" id="sec2">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Sampling" id="sec3">
        <title>Sampling</title>
        <p>A total of 18 samples were collected in 2024 during routine river biomonitoring in the Ohře River basin (Czech Republic) conducted by the state enterprise Povodí Ohře. Sampling followed a standardized biofilm collection protocol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">CEN/TR 17245 (2018)</xref>. Negative field controls were collected regularly throughout the sampling campaign and processed alongside environmental samples. Samples were fixed in 96% ethanol immediately after collection and stored at −20 °C until DNA extraction.</p>
        <p>Physicochemical data were obtained from the routine monitoring program of Povodí Ohře following their standard operating procedures. Annual mean values of water chemistry parameters for the studied river profiles were provided by the authority. Detailed information on sampling dates, site coordinates, and physicochemical parameters is given in Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S1.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing" id="sec4">
        <title>DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing</title>
        <p>Total genomic DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB/isopropanol precipitation protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Urbánková and Štěpka 2025</xref>). DNA extraction was performed in two replicates per sample, with negative extraction controls included in each batch. Artificial internal spike-in DNA was added prior to extraction but was not recovered at sufficient levels for further use. Sequences are provided in the Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S3.</p>
        <p>Two <italic>rbc</italic>L markers differing in length (263 bp and 331 bp) were targeted. Here, we use the term “marker” to refer to an amplified region defined by a specific primer pair within the coding region of the same gene. This usage is common in the metabarcoding literature, including studies of diatoms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Pérez-Burillo et al. 2022</xref>) and freshwater macroinvertebrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Vamos et al. 2017</xref>). PCR amplification was performed in duplicate for each extraction.</p>
        <p>The 263-bp marker was amplified using three forward primers (Diat_<italic>rbc</italic>L_708F1: AGGTGAAGTAAAAGGTTCWTACTTAAA, Diat_<italic>rbc</italic>L_708F2: AGGTGAAGTTAAAGGTTCWTAYTTAAA, Diat_<italic>rbc</italic>L_708F3: AGGTGAAACTAAAGGTTCWTACTTAAA) and two reverse primers (R3_1: CCTTCTAATTTACCWACWACTG, R3_2: CCTTCTAATTTACCWACAACAG) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Vasselon et al. 2017a</xref>). The PCR reaction mix contained 0.3 μL of each forward primer and 0.5 μL of each reverse primer (10 μM stocks).</p>
        <p>The 331-bp marker was amplified using the forward primer <italic>rbc</italic>L-646F (ATGCGTTGGAGAGARCGTTTC) and reverse primer <italic>rbc</italic>L-998R (GATCACCTTCTAATTTACCWACAACTG) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kelly et al. 2020</xref>), with 1 μL of each primer (10 μM) per reaction.</p>
        <p>All primers used for the first PCR included TruSeq adapters. The reaction mixture contained 12.5 μL of 2× Combi PPP Master Mix (Top-Bio, Czech Republic), 1 μL of template DNA, primers as specified above, and nuclease-free water to a final volume of 25 μL.</p>
        <p>The thermal cycling profile was identical for both markers and consisted of an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 20 seconds, annealing at 55 °C for 45 seconds, and elongation at 72 °C for 1 minute, with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 minutes.</p>
        <p>PCR replicates were pooled and purified using magnetic beads (Mag-Bind TotalPure NGS, Omega Biotek, USA) with bead-to-sample ratios of 1.4 and 1.2 for the 263-bp and 331-bp markers, respectively. Library preparation and paired-end sequencing (2 × 300 bp) were performed by Eurofins Genomics (Ebersberg, Germany) using an Illumina MiSeq platform. Raw sequence data were deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under project number PRJEB106074.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Bioinformatic processing" id="sec5">
        <title>Bioinformatic processing</title>
        <p>Raw paired-end FASTQ files were processed in R using DADA2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Callahan et al. 2016</xref>). The 263-bp and 331-bp <italic>rbc</italic>L amplicons were analysed separately. Primers were removed with cutadapt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Martin 2011</xref>); reads lacking both primers were discarded.</p>
        <p>Reads were split by sequencing run (n = 2 per amplicon) and processed independently to account for run-specific sequencing error profiles. After quality filtering (maxEE = c(2,2), truncQ = 2, maxN = 0), reads were truncated (263-bp: 260/240 bp; 331-bp: 280/250 bp), with truncation lengths selected based on visual inspection of per-base quality profiles in FastQC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Andrews 2010</xref>). ASVs were inferred with DADA2 (including error model learning with default parameters, dereplication and denoising), with error models estimated separately for each sequencing run. Paired reads were merged (maxMismatch = 1), sequence tables were combined across runs, and chimeras were removed using removeBimeraDenovo (consensus).</p>
        <p>ASVs with &lt; 2 reads were removed, and only sequences within expected lengths (263–266 bp; 331–334 bp) were retained. Reads were partitioned into off-target green plastids, internal standards (see Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S3 for sequences), and target red-lineage ASVs. To minimise stochastic noise from rare sequences, only red-lineage ASVs with a relative abundance ≥ 0.01% in at least one sample were retained for downstream analyses.</p>
        <p>Off-target red plastid lineages were evaluated by BLAST against NCBI (accessed April 2026). The top 10 hits were inspected; if all were unclassified, the first hit with a confident assignment at class level was used. Off-target red-lineage ASVs were retained.</p>
        <p>Consistency of technical replicates was evaluated after chimera removal. The relationship between replicate detection and ASV abundance was assessed using a binomial detection model based on total read counts. To account for sampling stochasticity, this relationship was additionally validated by repeated rarefaction (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S1).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="ASV-level analyses" id="sec6">
        <title>ASV-level analyses</title>
        <p>The effect of rarefaction to the minimum depth (89,023 reads per sample) was evaluated using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity and NMDS with Procrustes analysis (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S2) and showed no meaningful effect; rarefaction was therefore not applied. All datasets were normalised to relative abundances.</p>
        <p>For direct comparison, 331-bp ASVs were truncated to the overlapping 263-bp region (3' end) and collapsed to core sequences. Core sequences were classified as shared or amplicon-specific; prevalence and maximum relative abundance were computed and visualised (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S3).</p>
        <p>Correlation of relative abundances of shared core sequences across samples was examined using Spearman’s rank correlation.</p>
        <p>Binding sites of the 263-bp forward primers were evaluated on 331-bp ASVs to assess potential primer bias. Mismatch number and position were computed for all primer variants (IUPAC), retaining the best match. Mismatch counts were compared between shared and amplicon-specific ASVs (Wilcoxon test), and positions were visualised (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S4).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Species-level analyses" id="sec7">
        <title>Species-level analyses</title>
        <p>Reference sequences were obtained from Diat.Barcode v15.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Rimet et al. 2016</xref>). A 331-bp reference was prepared from aligned <italic>rbc</italic>L sequences using curated species names provided in Diat.Barcode. The full reference alignment was truncated to generate 331-bp and 263-bp reference datasets using AliView (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Larsson 2014</xref>).</p>
        <p>Taxonomy was assigned using the DADA2 naive Bayesian classifier (minBoot = 85). The 263-bp dataset and corresponding cores derived from 331-bp ASVs were classified jointly to ensure consistent taxonomic annotations. Taxa assigned only to genus level were retained as Genus sp.</p>
        <p>The full reference dataset was screened for mismatches in both forward and reverse primer binding sites, with particular focus on marker-specific species. Special attention was given to mismatches occurring in the last three nucleotides of the primer binding region, which are critical for PCR annealing.</p>
        <p>ASV tables were aggregated to species level. Abundances were corrected using <abbrev xlink:title="correction factor">CFv2</abbrev> values from the trait table of the Diat.Barcode database to account for species-specific differences in <italic>rbc</italic>L copy number (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Vasselon et al. 2018</xref>). Species composition was compared using Bray–Curtis (abundance) and Jaccard (presence–absence) distances. Correlation of community composition between amplicons was assessed using a Mantel test. Amplicon effects were tested by PERMANOVA with a paired design (stratified by sample), all implemented in the vegan R package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Oksanen et al. 2026</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="IPS-based analyses" id="sec8">
        <title><abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev>-based analyses</title>
        <p><abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> was calculated using IPSS and IPSVV values extracted from the Diat.barcode database and converted to the 20-point scale. Ecological status classes were assigned following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">AFNOR (2007)</xref>: High (17 ≤ <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> ≤ 20), Good (13 ≤ <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> &lt; 17), Moderate (9 ≤ <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> &lt; 13), Poor (5 ≤ <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> &lt; 9), Bad (1 ≤ <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> &lt; 5). <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> values were compared between amplicons using a paired Wilcoxon test and Pearson correlation.</p>
        <p>To disentangle the sources of <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> differences between markers, <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> was recalculated under four conditions: (i) full comparison between 263-bp and 331-bp datasets; (ii) comparison after harmonising sequence length (263 vs. 263core) to account for annotation effects; (iii) comparison after removal of marker-specific taxa to assess the contribution of taxon turnover; and (iv) comparison restricted to taxa shared within each sample to isolate the effect of relative abundance differences. Differences between conditions were summarised and compared across samples.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Code availability" id="sec9">
        <title>Code availability</title>
        <p>The R scripts and input files used for sequence processing and downstream analyses are archived on Zenodo: <ext-link xlink:href="10.5281/zenodo.20166294" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20166294</ext-link>.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec10">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Dataset" id="sec11">
        <title>Dataset</title>
        <p>In total, 18 epilithic biofilm samples from streams within the Ohře River basin were analysed. The sites spanned a pronounced environmental gradient, particularly in nutrient concentrations (N–NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>: 0.52–5.20 mg l<sup>–1</sup>; P–PO<sub>4</sub>: 0.02–0.18 mg l<sup>–1</sup>), conductivity (11.8–105.7 mS m<sup>–1</sup>), and suspended solids (2.5–53.8 mg l<sup>–1</sup>), whereas pH varied within a relatively narrow range (7.17–8.20).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Bioinformatic processing" id="sec12">
        <title>Bioinformatic processing</title>
        <p>Sequencing yielded a median of 206,000 and 196,000 reads per sample for the 263-bp and 331-bp amplicons, respectively. After quality filtering and chimera removal, a median of 171,000 and 142,000 reads were retained, corresponding to median retention rates of 84% and 74%. Read retention across processing steps is summarised in Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S2.</p>
        <p>Off-target amplification was negligible for both markers. Off-target green lineages accounted for 0.1% (119 ASVs) and 0.31% (13 ASVs) of raw reads for the 331-bp and 263-bp datasets, respectively. Off-target red lineages represented 0.14% (13 ASVs) and 0.04% (9 ASVs) of reads in the final datasets.</p>
        <p>Technical replicates showed high consistency, with concordance increasing with ASV abundance and approaching saturation for abundant ASVs (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S1). The 263-bp marker showed slightly higher consistency for low-abundance ASVs.</p>
        <p>Rarefaction had a negligible effect on community composition, as indicated by very low Bray–Curtis dissimilarity and nearly identical ordination structure (Procrustes correlation = 0.9999; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S2). The full dataset was therefore retained for downstream analyses.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="ASV-level comparison" id="sec13">
        <title>ASV-level comparison</title>
        <p>A total of 603 and 595 red-lineage ASVs (including off-target sequences) were detected in the 331-bp and 263-bp datasets, respectively. Of these, 414 (~70%) were shared based on identical 263-bp core sequences.</p>
        <p>Shared ASVs accounted for most reads (98.77% and 99.35% for the 331-bp and 263-bp datasets, respectively).</p>
        <p>Relative abundances of shared ASVs were strongly correlated across samples (Spearman ρ = 0.65–0.87, median = 0.77; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>), and overall community composition was highly consistent between datasets (Mantel test, r = 0.90, p = 0.001).</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">93AAB8C3-A79B-5153-9FFF-02E90BECBBC7</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Relationship between relative abundances of shared ASVs in the 263-bp and 331-bp datasets across samples. Each point represents an ASV–sample observation; point size indicates the number of 331-bp ASVs collapsing to the same 263-bp core sequence. The dashed line denotes the 1:1 relationship. Values are shown on a logarithmic scale.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="mbmg-10-e183921-g001.jpg" id="oo_1722293.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1722293</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Dataset-specific ASVs were generally rare and occurred in few samples (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S3). Only a single 331-bp-specific ASV reached high abundance (~10%) in one sample.</p>
        <p>Analysis of primer binding sites revealed no significant differences in mismatch number or positional distribution between shared and dataset-specific 331-bp ASVs (Wilcoxon test; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S4), indicating no systematic primer bias explaining ASV specificity.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Species-level comparison" id="sec14">
        <title>Species-level comparison</title>
        <p>A total of 4,787 sequences from the Diat.Barcode v15.2 database passed filtering criteria and were used as the reference dataset for the 331-bp marker. The 263-bp reference was derived by trimming these sequences to the overlapping region.</p>
        <p>Taxonomic assignment (minBoot = 85) yielded 535 (84.5%) and 497 (83.7%) annotated ASVs for the 331-bp and 263-bp datasets, respectively (including genus-level assignments treated as Genus sp.). Exact matches to the reference database were obtained for 199 ASVs (31.4%) in the 331-bp dataset and 195 ASVs (32.8%) in the 263-bp dataset.</p>
        <p>The number of detected taxa was similar between datasets (185 for 331-bp and 181 for 263-bp), with 159 taxa shared. The remaining 26 and 22 taxa were initially dataset specific.</p>
        <p>After accounting for differences in sequence length (i.e. comparison with truncated 331-bp sequences), the number of genuinely marker-specific taxa decreased to 21 (331-bp) and 17 (263-bp). These taxa were consistently of low abundance and low prevalence.</p>
        <p>Six species detected only by the 263-bp marker showed mismatches in one or both primer binding regions of the 331-bp marker (e.g. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Caloneis">Caloneis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="amphisbaena">amphisbaena</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Epithemia">Epithemia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="sorex">sorex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Hantzschia">Hantzschia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="amphioxys">amphioxys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Similar primer mismatches were also observed in taxa such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cocconeis">Cocconeis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp., which were recovered by both markers at comparable relative abundances.</p>
        <p>Species composition differed significantly between datasets (PERMANOVA, p = 0.001), although marker identity explained only a small proportion of variation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.035). Paired samples were consistently more similar to each other than to other samples (p &lt; 0.001; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S5).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="IPS-based assessment" id="sec15">
        <title><abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev>-based assessment</title>
        <p><abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> values were highly consistent between markers (r = 0.94), although the 263-bp marker tended to yield higher <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev>(20) scores (median difference = 0.890 <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev>(20) units). This shift resulted in a change of ecological status class in three samples (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">B200E6AC-333B-534C-9D98-BBEEEDEA7AB8</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Comparison of <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> values between the 263-bp and 331-bp datasets. Each point represents a sample; the dashed line denotes the 1:1 relationship.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="mbmg-10-e183921-g002.jpg" id="oo_1722294.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1722294</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Sequential decomposition of <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> differences showed that most of the difference was already captured when only relative abundance differences among shared taxa were considered (median effect = 0.568 <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev>(20)). Adding sample-specific and marker-specific taxa caused only minor additional changes (median shifts = -0.010 and -0.002 <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev>(20), respectively). In contrast, annotation bias related to amplicon length produced a larger additional shift (median shift = 0.334 <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev>(20)), indicating that annotation-related effects represented the main secondary driver of <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> differences after abundance variation. Overall, these results confirm that marker-specific taxa contributed only minimally to <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> variation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">63D71F0A-AC3C-5677-B440-B9BEB9D9572E</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Decomposition of differences in <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> values between the 263-bp and 331-bp datasets. Boxplots show (<bold>A</bold>) full difference (263 − 331), (<bold>B</bold>) length/annotation effect (263 − 263core), (<bold>C</bold>) marker-specific taxa effect, and (<bold>D</bold>) shared taxa abundance effect across samples.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="mbmg-10-e183921-g003.jpg" id="oo_1722295.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1722295</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec16">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <sec sec-type="Marker performance" id="sec17">
        <title>Marker performance</title>
        <p>This study compared two partially overlapping regions of the <italic>rbc</italic>L gene (263-bp and 331-bp) as candidates for routine DNA-based biomonitoring under the European Water Framework Directive. Although the dataset was relatively small, it covered a meaningful gradient of key physicochemical drivers of diatom communities. Both markers have previously been validated across broader gradients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Pérez-Burillo et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Kahlert et al. 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kelly et al. 2024</xref>), suggesting that their performance is not restricted to the conditions represented here. The dataset is therefore suitable for evaluating methodological consistency between markers.</p>
        <p>Across analytical levels—from ASVs to taxonomic assignment and index calculation—both markers recovered a highly consistent dominant community signal. This dominant fraction, which primarily determines biomonitoring outcomes, was stable between datasets, resulting in similar species composition patterns and consistent <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev>-based ecological classifications.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Role of abundance and rare taxa" id="sec18">
        <title>Role of abundance and rare taxa</title>
        <p>Agreement between datasets at the ASV level was strongly dependent on relative abundance. Nearly all highly abundant ASVs were shared, whereas discrepancies were largely confined to low-abundance ASVs occurring in few samples. This pattern is consistent with previous studies showing that rare ASVs disproportionately contribute to differences between metabarcoding datasets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Pérez-Burillo et al. 2021</xref>).</p>
        <p>Rare ASVs, and the taxa they represent, are inherently more sensitive to methodological variation and stochastic detection. Three main sources contribute to this variability: primer bias, PCR stochasticity, and sampling effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Leray and Knowlton 2017</xref>). While primer bias can in principle affect both abundant and rare taxa, PCR and sampling stochasticity disproportionately influence the detection of low-abundance taxa.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Primer bias" id="sec19">
        <title>Primer bias</title>
        <p>Primer bias is a well-documented source of variation between markers. Mismatches in primer binding sites can reduce amplification efficiency and may lead to underrepresentation or failure to detect affected taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Elbrecht and Leese 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Piñol et al. 2015</xref>). Analysis of primer binding sites revealed mismatches at the 3' end of the 331-bp primers for several taxa in the Diat.Barcode reference database, some of which were also present in our samples.</p>
        <p>In our dataset, primer bias did not result in the loss of abundant taxa but instead manifested as reduced PCR efficiency, leading to minor shifts in relative abundance. For example, taxa of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cocconeis">Cocconeis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were recovered by both markers at comparable abundances despite the presence of mismatches.</p>
        <p>In contrast, primer mismatches are likely more critical for rare taxa and can contribute to their apparent absence. However, for low-abundance taxa, the effects of primer bias cannot be clearly separated from stochastic PCR and sampling processes. In our study, this concerned species such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Hantzschia">Hantzschia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="amphioxys">amphioxys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Caloneis">Caloneis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="amphisbaena">amphisbaena</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Epithemia">Epithemia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="sorex">sorex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, which can become locally abundant under specific conditions and are relevant for <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> calculation (i.e. have defined IPSS and IPSVV values). Although their influence on <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> was negligible in this dataset, their potential underrepresentation should be considered, particularly under environmental conditions that favour their proliferation.</p>
        <p>The multiplex primer design used for the shorter amplicon reduces primer bias and may enhance detection of low-abundance ASVs, thereby increasing sensitivity to the rare biosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Vasselon et al. 2017a</xref>). Nevertheless, the low prevalence of primer mismatches in our data indicates that most observed discrepancies are better explained by stochastic processes than by systematic primer bias.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Taxonomic assignment" id="sec20">
        <title>Taxonomic assignment</title>
        <p>Differences in species composition and <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> values can also arise during taxonomic assignment. These are primarily attributable to differences in marker length, limitations of reference databases, and the inherent behaviour of the Naive Bayesian classifier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Pérez-Burillo et al. 2022</xref>).</p>
        <p>Together, these factors lead to differences in taxonomic resolution (both loss and gain) and uncertainty introduced by classification thresholds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Pérez-Burillo et al. 2022</xref>). Species identification is therefore strongly influenced by the coverage and quality of reference databases.</p>
        <p>Reference coverage has improved substantially in recent years, with dominant taxa now being well represented, as reflected in robust <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> calculations. In particular, taxonomic work using integrative approaches (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Kollár et al. 2026</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Pinseel et al. 2017</xref>) can further improve both the content and structure of reference diatom databases. However, these approaches are not yet a gold standard in diatom taxonomy, and most taxonomic studies still rely primarily on morphological identification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Kollár et al. 2025</xref>).</p>
        <p>Uncertainty associated with taxonomic assignment can be reduced by calculating ecological indices directly at the ASV level. This approach better exploits the full potential of NGS data by capturing both species-level patterns and intraspecific variation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tapolczai et al. 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kelly et al. 2024</xref>). However, fully decoupling from species is not desirable, as species-level traits underpin ecological interpretation and regulatory frameworks.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="IPS robustness" id="sec21">
        <title><abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> robustness</title>
        <p>Despite differences at lower levels of organisation, <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev>-based ecological assessment remained highly consistent between markers, reflecting the dominance of high-abundance taxa in index calculation.</p>
        <p>Decomposition analysis provides a mechanistic explanation for this pattern: <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> differences were primarily driven by quantitative variation in shared taxa, with annotation bias related to marker length as a secondary contribution, while marker-specific and sample-specific taxa had negligible effects.</p>
        <p>An important factor influencing species abundances is the correction factor (<abbrev xlink:title="correction factor">CFv2</abbrev>), which accounts for interspecific differences in <italic>rbc</italic>L copy number per cell and converts read counts to species abundances. The correction factor applied in our study was originally established for the 263-bp marker (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Vasselon et al. 2018</xref>). However, differences in primer design (single pair vs. multiplex) as well as amplicon length may warrant marker-specific calibration. Deriving a marker-specific correction factor for the 331-bp region could therefore improve agreement between markers and with morphology-based assessments.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Implications" id="sec22">
        <title>Implications</title>
        <p>Overall, our results demonstrate that differences in marker length, which determine taxonomic resolution, do not necessarily translate into differences in ecological interpretation. Instead, the robustness of <abbrev xlink:title="Specific Pollution Sensitivity Index">IPS</abbrev> depends primarily on the dominance structure of communities and on how strongly individual taxa contribute to index calculation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Tapolczai et al. 2019</xref>).</p>
        <p>From an applied perspective, the longer 331-bp amplicon appears more suitable for routine biomonitoring. Its higher taxonomic resolution improves discrimination among abundant taxa, which are the main drivers of index values. This advantage can be further enhanced by appropriate calibration to better translate read counts into species abundance estimates.</p>
        <p>For biomonitoring purposes, rare taxa are generally not critical for index calculation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Vasselon et al. 2017a</xref>). However, for studies focusing on the rare biosphere, it may be beneficial to adapt primer design (e.g. using multiplex strategies like those applied for the 263-bp marker) to improve detection of low-abundance taxa, while still retaining the advantages of the longer marker.</p>
        <p>Taken together, our results indicate that the 331-bp marker provides a robust and reliable basis for routine biomonitoring under the Water Framework Directive, with performance comparable to the shorter marker and sufficient consistency for ecological status assessment. While further optimisation, such as marker-specific calibration, may improve quantitative accuracy, our findings suggest that the 331-bp marker can be applied in practice without major methodological adjustments.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>AI-assisted tools (ChatGPT, OpenAI) were used to improve the clarity and readability of the manuscript and to support the development of R scripts; all scientific content and interpretations remain the responsibility of the authors.</p>
      <p>We thank Emil Janeček and Ing. Andrea Zapriháčová of Povodí Ohře, state enterprise, for carrying out field sampling. We are also grateful to our families for their patience and support throughout this work.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>AFNOR (2007) NF T90-354. Qualité de l’eau. Détermination de l’Indice Biologique Diatomées (IBD), 1–79.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>An SM, Choi DH, Lee H, Lee JH, Noh JH (2018) Next-generation sequencing reveals the diversity of benthic diatoms in tidal flats. Algae 33: 167–180. <ext-link xlink:href="10.4490/algae.2018.33.4.3" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2018.33.4.3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Andrews S (2010) FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP (2016) DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nature Methods 13: 581–583. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/nmeth.3869" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>CEN/TR 17245 (2018) Water quality – Technical report for the routine sampling of benthic diatoms from rivers and lakes adapted for metabarcoding analyses.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Elbrecht V, Leese F (2015) Can DNA-based ecosystem assessments quantify species abundance? Testing primer bias and biomass-sequence relationships with an innovative metabarcoding protocol. PLoS ONE 10: e0130324. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0130324" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130324</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Kahlert M, Bailet B, Chonova T, Karjalainen SM, Schneider SC, Tapolczai K (2021) Same same, but different: The response of diatoms to environmental gradients in Fennoscandian streams and lakes – barcodes, traits and microscope data compared. Ecological Indicators 130: 108088. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108088" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108088</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Kahlert M, Kelly MG, Mann DG, Rimet F, Sato S, Bouchez A, Keck F (2019) Connecting the morphological and molecular species concepts to facilitate species identification within the genus Fragilaria (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum">Bacillariophyta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Journal of Phycology 55: 948–970. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/jpy.12886" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12886</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Kahlert M, Karjalainen SM, Keck F, Kelly M, Ramon M, Rimet F, Schneider S, Tapolczai K, Zimmermann J (2022) Co-occurrence, ecological profiles and geographical distribution based on unique molecular identifiers of the common freshwater diatoms Fragilaria and Ulnaria. Ecological Indicators 141: 109114. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109114" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109114</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Keck F, Vasselon V, Rimet F, Bouchez A, Kahlert M (2018) Boosting DNA metabarcoding for biomonitoring with phylogenetic estimation of operational taxonomic units’ ecological profiles. Molecular Ecology Resources 18: 1299–1309. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1755-0998.12919" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12919</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Keck F, Blackman RC, Bossart R, Brantschen J, Couton M, Hürlemann S, Kirschner D, Locher N, Zhang H, Altermatt F (2022) Meta-analysis shows both congruence and complementarity of DNA and eDNA metabarcoding to traditional methods for biological community assessment. Molecular Ecology 31: 1820–1835. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/mec.16364" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16364</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Kelly MG, Mann DG, Taylor JD, Juggins S, Walsh K, Pitt JA, Read DS (2024) Maximising environmental pressure-response relationship signals from diatom-based metabarcoding in rivers. Science of the Total Environment 914: 169445. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169445" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169445</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Kelly MG, Juggins S, Mann DG, Sato S, Glover R, Boonham N, Sapp M, Lewis E, Hany U, Kille P, Jones T, Walsh K (2020) Development of a novel metric for evaluating diatom assemblages in rivers using DNA metabarcoding. Ecological Indicators 118: 106725. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106725" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106725</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Kollár J, Kopalová K, Kohler TJ (2025) Diatom studies three decades into the molecular age: A bibliometric analysis reveals genetic underexploration of diatoms compared to other taxa. Fottea 25: 1–11. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5507/fot.2024.009" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5507/fot.2024.009</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Kollár J, Van de Vijver B, Kulichová J, Hejduková E, Viso R, Kohler TJ, Kahlert M, Pinseel E, Poulíčková A, Zimmermann J, Neustupa J, Vyverman W, Kopalová K (2026) A polyphasic taxonomy of the pseudocryptic diatom species complex Pinnularia acidicola, including description of new species. European Journal of Phycology: 1–25. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/09670262.2026.2626682" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2026.2626682</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Larsson A (2014) AliView: A fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics 30: 3276–3278. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/bioinformatics/btu531" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu531</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Leray M, Knowlton N (2017) Random sampling causes the low reproducibility of rare eukaryotic OTUs in Illumina COI metabarcoding. PeerJ 5: e3006. <ext-link xlink:href="10.7717/peerj.3006" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Liu M, Zhao Y, Sun Y, Li Y, Wu P, Zhou S, Ren L (2020) Comparative study on diatom morphology and molecular identification in drowning cases. Forensic Science International 317: 110552. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110552" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110552</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Martin M (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal 17: 10. <ext-link xlink:href="10.14806/ej.17.1.200" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Mortágua A, Vasselon V, Oliveira R, Elias C, Chardon C, Bouchez A, Rimet F, Feio MJ, Almeida SFP (2019) Applicability of DNA metabarcoding approach in the bioassessment of Portuguese rivers using diatoms. Ecological Indicators 106: 105470. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105470" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105470</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Oksanen J, Simpson GL, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H, Barbour M, Bedward M, Bolker B, Borcard D, Borman T, Carvalho G, Chirico M, De Caceres M, Durand S, Evangelista HBA, FitzJohn R, Friendly M, Furneaux B, Hannigan G, Hill MO, Lahti L, McGlinn D, Ouellette M-H, Ribeiro Cunha E, Smith T, Stier A, Ter Braak CJF, Weedon J (2026) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.7-3. <ext-link xlink:href="10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Pérez-Burillo J, Mann DG, Trobajo R (2022) Evaluation of two short overlapping rbcL markers for diatom metabarcoding of environmental samples: Effects on biomonitoring assessment and species resolution. Chemosphere 307: 135933. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135933" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135933</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Pérez-Burillo J, Trobajo R, Vasselon V, Rimet F, Bouchez A, Mann DG (2020) Evaluation and sensitivity analysis of diatom DNA metabarcoding for WFD bioassessment of Mediterranean rivers. Science of the Total Environment 727: 138445. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138445" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138445</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Pérez-Burillo J, Trobajo R, Leira M, Keck F, Rimet F, Sigró J, Mann DG (2021) DNA metabarcoding reveals differences in distribution patterns and ecological preferences among genetic variants within some key freshwater diatom species. Science of the Total Environment 798: 149029. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149029" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149029</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Piñol J, Mir G, Gomez-Polo P, Agustí N (2015) Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods. Molecular Ecology Resources 15: 819–830. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1755-0998.12355" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12355</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Pinseel E, Vanormelingen P, Hamilton PB, Vyverman W, Van de Vijver B, Kopalová K (2017) Molecular and morphological characterization of the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Achnanthidium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">minutissimum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> complex (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum">Bacillariophyta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in Petuniabukta (Spitsbergen, High Arctic), including the description of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">digitatum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> sp. nov. European Journal of Phycology 52: 264–280. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/09670262.2017.1283540" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2017.1283540</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Rimet F, Chaumeil P, Keck F, Kermarrec L, Vasselon V, Kahlert M, Franc A, Bouchez A (2016) R-Syst::diatom: An open-access and curated barcode database for diatoms and freshwater monitoring. Database 2016: baw016. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/database/baw016" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baw016</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Stoof-Leichsenring KR, Herzschuh U, Pestryakova LA, Klemm J, Epp LS, Tiedemann R (2015) Genetic data from algae sedimentary DNA reflect the influence of environment over geography. Scientific Reports 5: 12924. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/srep12924" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12924</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Tapolczai K, Keck F, Bouchez A, Rimet F, Kahlert M, Vasselon V (2019) Diatom DNA metabarcoding for biomonitoring: Strategies to avoid major taxonomical and bioinformatical biases limiting molecular indices capacities. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7: 409. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fevo.2019.00409" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00409</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Tapolczai K, Selmeczy GB, Szabó B, B-Béres V, Keck F, Bouchez A, Rimet F, Padisák J (2021) The potential of exact sequence variants (ESVs) to interpret and assess the impact of agricultural pressure on stream diatom assemblages revealed by DNA metabarcoding. Ecological Indicators 122: 107322. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107322" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107322</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Urbánková P, Štěpka J (2025) CTAB-chloroform DNA extraction from ethanol-preserved samples. protocols.io. <ext-link xlink:href="10.17504/protocols.io.dm6gpzxwdlzp/v1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.dm6gpzxwdlzp/v1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Vamos EE, Elbrecht V, Leese F (2017) Short COI markers for freshwater macroinvertebrate metabarcoding. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 1: e14625. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/mbmg.1.14625" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.1.14625</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Vasselon V, Rimet F, Tapolczai K, Bouchez A (2017a) Assessing ecological status with diatoms DNA metabarcoding: Scaling-up on a WFD monitoring network (Mayotte island, France). Ecological Indicators 82: 1–12. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.024" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.024</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Vasselon V, Rimet F, Tapolczai K, Bouchez A (2017b) Application of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) metabarcoding to diatom biomonitoring: Do DNA extraction methods matter? Freshwater Science 36: 162–177. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1086/690649" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1086/690649</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Vasselon V, Bouchez A, Rimet F, Jacquet S, Trobajo R, Corniquel M, Tapolczai K, Domaizon I (2018) Avoiding quantification bias in metabarcoding: Application of a cell biovolume correction factor in diatom molecular biomonitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9: 1060–1069. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/2041-210X.12960" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12960</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Vasselon V, Rivera SF, Ács É, Almeida SFP, Andree KB, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, Bailet B, Baričević A, Beentjes KK, Bettig J, Bouchez A, Capelli C, Chardon C, Duleba M, Elersek T, Genthon C, Jablonska M, Jacas L, Kahlert M, Kelly MG, Macher J-N, Mauri F, Moletta-Denat M, Mortágua A, Pawlowski J, Pérez-Burillo J, Pfannkuchen M, Pilgrim E, Pissaridou P, Rimet F, Stanic K, Tapolczai K, Theroux S, Trobajo R, Van der Hoorn B, Vasquez MI, Vidal M, Wanless D, Warren J, Zimmermann J, Paix B (2025) Proficiency testing and cross-laboratory method comparison to support standardisation of diatom DNA metabarcoding for freshwater biomonitoring. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 9: e133264. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/mbmg.9.133264" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.9.133264</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Wolf DI, Vis ML (2020) Stream algal biofilm community diversity along an acid mine drainage recovery gradient using multimarker metabarcoding. Journal of Phycology 56: 11–22. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/jpy.12935" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12935</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="Additional information" id="sec23">
      <title>Additional information</title>
      <sec sec-type="Conflict of interest" id="sec24">
        <title>Conflict of interest</title>
        <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ethical statement" id="sec25">
        <title>Ethical statement</title>
        <p>No ethical statement was reported.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Artificial Intelligence (AI) use" id="sec26">
        <title>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</title>
        <p>Regarding the use of AI in the preparation of this manuscript, the authors declare the following:</p>
        <p>AI-assisted tools (ChatGPT, OpenAI) were used to support language editing and improve the clarity and structure of the manuscript text, and to assist with writing and troubleshooting R scripts used for data processing and analysis. The AI did not contribute to analytical decisions or interpretation of results. All outputs were reviewed and validated by the authors.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Funding" id="sec27">
        <title>Funding</title>
        <p>This work was supported by the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (TA ČR), project no. TQ03000438 - Applicability of DNA metabarcoding for biomonitoring of streams in Ohře and Lower Elbe hydrological basins.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author contributions" id="sec28">
        <title>Author contributions</title>
        <p>Writing - original draft: PU. Writing - review and editing: JŠ.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author ORCIDs" id="sec29">
        <title>Author ORCIDs</title>
        <p>P. Urbánková <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1788-3863" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1788-3863</ext-link></p>
        <p>J. Štěpka <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1814-2035" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1814-2035</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data availability" id="sec30">
        <title>Data availability</title>
        <p>All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/mbmg.10.183921.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">DC559BA9-DD4E-5CB1-A780-548707C06686</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Additional information</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>zip</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p><bold>fig. S1</bold>. Effect of rarefaction on technical replicate consistency within each marker. High concordance between replicates indicates limited influence of stochastic sampling. <bold>fig. S2</bold>. Procrustes analysis comparing ordinations based on rarefied and non-rarefied datasets. Nearly identical configurations (Procrustes correlation ≈ 1) indicate a negligible effect of rarefaction. <bold>fig. S3</bold>. Joint distribution of ASV relative abundance and prevalence for shared and dataset-specific ASVs. <bold>fig. S4</bold>. Number and positional distribution of primer mismatches in the 263-bp forward primer binding region for shared and dataset-specific ASVs. No systematic differences are observed between groups. <bold>fig. S5</bold>. Ordination of community composition showing paired samples from the 263-bp and 331-bp datasets. <bold>table S1</bold>. Sampling sites, geographic coordinates, and associated environmental data, including physicochemical parameters. <bold>table S2</bold>. Sequencing statistics per sample, including raw read counts, retained reads after quality filtering and chimera removal, and retention rates for both amplicons. <bold>table S3</bold>. Reference sequences of internal DNA standards (IDS).</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="mbmg-10-e183921-s001.7z" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="x-7z-compressed" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1722296.7z">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1722296</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Urbánková Pavla, Štěpka Jan</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
